Philosophy The Lorax By Dr. Seuss - 1370 Words

PHILOSOPHY CCA-Brandon Campos Philosophy translates literally into â€Å"love for wisdom†. This â€Å"wisdom† is categorized into 6 disciplines; Logic and Reason, Metaphysics, Epistemology, Aesthetics, Social and Political Philosophy and Philosophy of Science. Throughout our course we focused on Metaphysics, Aesthetics, Epistemology and Logic and Reason. My selected children’s story book is The Lorax by Dr. Seuss. The book does show strong signs of Epistemology, Logic and Reason and its pictures display some theories we learned in our aesthetics unit. Knowledge and perception are apparent along with Representationism throughout the plot. The Lorax begins in a ruined and polluted town. A curious unnamed boy wanders to the old Oncler factory looking†¦show more content†¦However, it is best suited for children and adolescents. Due to the fact that The Lorax is a children’s book, the concepts and ideas presented within the book are clear and simple, and are easy to reminisce with. The Lorax strongly displays signs of Ethics and Epistemology, with Aesthetics relevant in the pictures of the book and Metaphysics being weakly hinted at. First of all, Ethics and Epistemology are very present throughout the plot of the story. The concepts of knowledge, perceptions, opinions and morality are presented through the characters of Mr. Oncler and the Lorax. An example is when the narrator of the story said, â€Å"some people say, if you look deep enough you can still see, today, where the Lorax once stood, just as long as it could, before somebody lifted the Lorax away.† (PG 2) This relates to epistemology the quote represents a belief or folklore. Epistemology is a unit which focuses itself on knowledge and finding the â€Å"truth† to questions. Finding that truth all depends on making logical and valid claims. What is difficult is that majority of those claims are beliefs, and cannot be definitely proven, and require trust to believe them. This is because beliefs are subjective, which means that it is something based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. Secondly, Perception and truth are relevant in discussing Mr. Oncler’s thinkingShow MoreRelatedJohn Simpsons Vision For The Museum Essay1303 Words   |  6 Pagessaw the Seuss advertisement, I had my eye on a few of them. However, as a dyslexic person writing, and applying for all three, last minute I wrote for research on his life. For me the biggest connection was museum flow, and space usage in different highlighted sections .As research continues I’m wanting to link preexisting infrastructure together. Conversations regarding revitalize Springfield downtown even if it means putting a brand that included the city of Seussville. Contemplating Seuss as a majorRead MoreThe Novel Theodor Seuss And The Lorax 1829 Words   |  8 PagesTheodor Seuss Geisel was born on March 2, 1904, in Springfield, Massachusetts. Before his death in 1991, Geisel, better known by the pseudonym â€Å"Dr. Seuss† wrote and illustrated over sixty children s books. While being beloved for their effervescent characters and flowing rhymes, these books also contained more subversive ideas that shattered the preconceived notions of children’s literature. Hidden behind the colourfully illustrated pages of â€Å"Horton Hears a Who!†, â€Å"The Sneetches†, â€Å"Yertle the Turtle†Read MoreThe Lorax Essay example1500 Words   |  6 Pagesregulations. So what went wrong?† In order to understand exactly the story of The Lorax as an allegory of economic principles you must understand in terms of different philosophy foundations, scarcity, uncertainty, interdependencies, and the duel nature of rights. Philosophy foundations are all based on making a choice in any given situation. In the story The Lorax by Dr. Seuss the two main characters, the Once-ler and the Lorax, had conflicting philosophical perspectives. The Lorax’s prevailing philosophicalRead MoreEssay on Theodore Geisels Emergence as Dr. Seuss3883 Words   |  16 PagesTheodore Geisels Emergence as Dr. Seuss The appellation , Dr. Seuss, has become a name that often evokes fond memories of a cherished childhood. Entrenched in monotony of gray day when, The sun did not shine./ It was too wet to play, we only had to look at the grinning face of Dr. Seusss famous cat to remind us that there was more to do than wait as time slipped away. There was something appealing in the simple anapestic tetrameter rhythm, coupled with nonsensical words and illustrations

Sonia Nazario s Enrique s Journey - 1698 Words

A young child with lifeless wide eyes, teeters on broomstick legs, which are little more than skin stretched over bones, her ribs protruding as her emaciated arms hold a mud pie that she sits chewing on desperately trying to stave off the pangs of hunger. In most of the world we are ignorant of what it is like to be constantly hungry. In the United States, we are blissfully unaware of what it means to have a food shortage. But what do desperate, motivated, mothers and children resort to when faced with starvation, furthermore, what is the corresponding result on, not only their own families and countries, but the countries that they go to, to seek help, as well as refuge from. Sonia Nazario’s book Enrique’s Journey illustrates the struggles and issues that surround illegal immigration into the United States, however, I feel that as a nation, we should investigate further the reasons behind this influx in addition to what drives people to make this harrowing and dangerou s journey to the United States through South America or from the Caribbean moreover, can this situation be rectified at its source. Have you ever thought about what it is like to be constantly hungry as a result of not having access to adequate food? For some people in the world this is a reality. In my interview with Melinda Vonderhorst she recounts her personal observations from her five trips to Haiti, where she helped to build a school along with working in an orphanage and clinic, of countless childrenShow MoreRelatedEnrique s Journey By Sonia Nazario1387 Words   |  6 Pages Enrique’s Journey Introduction In this story, Sonia Nazario recounts how a Honduran boy called Enrique passed many dangerous situations in his travel to the United States in order to finally meet with his mother. Enrique began his travel to the United States eleven years after his mother left him in Honduras. Enrique faced gangsters, bandits and corrupt police officers when he was in the train called â€Å"El Tren de la Muerte†. The only thing that he was carrying was his mother’s phone number. But EnriqueRead MoreEnrique s Journey By Sonia Nazario872 Words   |  4 PagesEnrique’s Journey In the book Enrique’s Journey written by Sonia Nazario, a projects reporter for the Los Angeles Times, Nazario talks about the true story of a young Honduran boy named Enrique that was abandoned at the age of 5 by his mother Lourdes. His mom left to the United States as an immigrant to work so she can be able to give her poor children a better living. After 11 years of tears, sadness and loneliness pass Enrique decides to go to North Carolina in search of his mother. Family is theRead MoreEnrique s Journey By Sonia Nazario Essay1314 Words   |  6 PagesEnrique’s Journey written by Sonia Nazario is a work of non-fiction that follows the journey of a young Central American boy to find his mother Lourdes, who left him at the age of five. Before Nazario introduces Enrique she discusses the experiences she put herself through to gain a better understanding of the travels a migrant child and adult go through in their conquest to make it to the United States. While going thr ough the trials that many migrants put themselves through Nazario learns the storiesRead MoreA Brief Note On Enrique s Journey, By Sonia Nazario Essay1552 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"If you move, I’ll kill you. I’ll break you in two† (Nazario 87). Enrique’s Journey, a nonfiction book by Sonia Nazario, painstakingly follows the trek of a young teenage boy’s treacherous journey to the United States from Honduras. At the tender age of five, a horrified and confused Enrique watched his mother Lourdes walk away from him and onto El Norte, The North. Eleven years later Sonia Nazario, a project reporter for the Los Angeles Times, traces each bitter step of Enrique’s gruesome and longRead MoreAnalysis Of Sonia Nazario s Enrique s Journey 1622 Words   |  7 PagesIn Sonia Nazario’s book, Enrique’s Journey, Enrique rides on top of slow-moving railroad cars in hopes of reaching his mother, who left him at a very young age to find work in the United States. Most of the immigrants in the book are fleeing because they are trying to escape poverty, but it does not go into a lot of depth about how drug wars play a big role in immigration. The persistent violent behavior in Mexico executed by drug cartels, caused a generous amount of Mexican natives to flee to theRead MoreAnalysis Of Enrique s Journey And Journalist For La Times1344 Words   |  6 PagesEnrique’s Journey I only knew 3 things about those who immigrated to the US. One, the majority were Mexican families. Two, they only migrate to the US, because they are poor and there are more job opportunities with better pay. Three, they got to the US by being smuggled in a van over the Border. All these things listed are true to an extent, but on a much deeper level. Sonia Nazario, author of Enrique s Journey and journalist for LA times, has opened my eyes with Enrique s Journey. Enrique is a youngRead MoreEnriques Journey Essay1498 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿ Enrique’s Journey Case Study Samantha Wix Our Lady of the Lake University According to President Obama (2014), â€Å"If we are serious about economic growth, it is time to heed the call of business leaders, labor leaders, faith leaders, and law enforcement- and fix our broken immigration system. Republicans and Democrats in the Senate have acted. I know that members of both parties in the House want to do the same† (President Obama, 2014). The United States of American has long been theRead MoreEnrique s Ecological Analysis And Analysis1721 Words   |  7 Pagesextreme poverty. Enrique’s Journey depicts a five year old Central American boy from Honduras who mother leaves the country to find employment in the United States on January 29, 1989 (Nazario, 2007. p. 5). Within Enrique’s journey it is clear that he has experienced poverty and oppression on every level. Lourdes (Enrique’s mother) grew up in extreme poverty and hope that she will be able to protect her children from it (Nazario, 2007. p. 4). Lourdes is a single mother of Enrique and Belky, his sevenRead More Rhetoric in the American Immigration Debate Essay1659 Words   |  7 Pagesdebate, US president Obama, journalist Sonia Nazario, and Arizona congressman J.D. Hayworth, we can evaluate the effectiveness of the different rhetorical approaches by whether or not they reach their intended audiences. Nazario fulfills her journalistic raison d’à ªtre by succeeding at objectivity, while Obama and Hayworth as politicians succeed by lying by omission in speeches and in writi ng in order to pursue policy goals and appease supporters. Sonia Nazario, herself an immigrant, was aware ofRead MoreStrains Among Enrique And Lourdes1582 Words   |  7 PagesStrains amongst Enrique and Lourdes start to rise. Enrique hates his mom for having abandoned him, and says that cash does not unravel anything (197). He blames her for cherishing Belky more than she did him, contending Belky got a decent home while he was left with a reckless father. He tells Lourdes that he considers his grandma, Maria, to be his genuine mother. Lourdes tells Enrique that he ought to accuse his dad for leaving, and his grandma for making him offer flavors in the city when he

Is The Marxist Distinction Between Scientific and Utopian Socialism Justified - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2294 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Politics Essay Type Analytical essay Level High school Did you like this example? To what extent, if any, is the Marxist distinction between scientific and utopian socialism justified? This essay will return to the writings of Marx to assess to what extent he drew a distinction between â€Å"scientific† and â€Å"utopian† socialism. The essay will construct a reading of Marx that suggests he did not draw a distinction between scientific socialism and utopian socialism. Marx and Engels adopted a scientific methodology and thus, they did not believe that a socialist/communist society is utopian. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Is The Marxist Distinction Between Scientific and Utopian Socialism Justified" essay for you Create order However, the scientific method objected to elements of utopian socialism, which assumed â€Å"socialism is the expression of absolute truth, reason and justice, and has only to be discovered to conquer all the world by virtue of its own power. And as an absolute truth is independent of time, space, and of the historical development of man† (Engels, on-line). In contrast, Marxists base their socialism on a dialectical process, where a socialist/communist society is the natural culmination of the historical process. The dialectical process, Engels argues, is scientific: â€Å"Nature is the proof of dialectics, and it must be said for modern science that it has furnished this proof with very rich materials increasingly daily† (Engels, on-line). Thus, Marxists view history as a universal, teleological and pre-destined process, where history is the process by which â€Å"the spectre of communism† is made actual. To understand Marx’s theory of history, and why he did not see a socialist/communist future as utopian but the culmination of a scientific process, it is important to elucidate Marx’s philosophy of science. The most important aspect of Marx’s philosophy of science for the purpose of this essay is to realise that â€Å"Marx thought that the human sciences and the natural sciences are governed by essentially the same methods† (Miller, 2000, p. 532). This means that the human sciences are predictable, measurable and observable in the same way as the natural sciences. However, in contrast, to traditional empiricists, Marx did not base prediction on clearly observable phenomenon; instead, he sought prediction by locating underlying causal structures (Miller, 2000, p. 532). This understanding of the human sciences and natural sciences led Marx to produce a theory of historical determinism, based on a dialectical historical materialism that constructed a communist society as both a scientific and utopi an future. Marx’s theory of history is derived from Hegel since he employs Hegel’s notion of history as a dialectical process. Goodwin argues that â€Å"Marx used the dialectical less technically and less insistently than Hegel, but [the dialectical] forms the basis of his conception of capitalism as ‘contradictory’ and ridden with class conflict† (Goodwin, 1997, p. 68). Therefore, the Hegelian influence on Marx cannot be overstated. However, as Hampsher-Monk notes there were two Hegelian outlooks at the time Marx was writing. One was conservative and attempted to show that the social/political status quo was rational and the historical process had been achieved; or, as Marx put it, it attempted to â€Å"turn philosophy inward† (Hampsher-Monk, 1992, p. 484). The second Hegelian outlook aimed to â€Å"turn philosophy outward† – that is to make what is currently an imperfect and irrational social reality conform to ration ality (Hampsher-Monk, 1992, p. 484). Employing a dialectical understanding of history, Marx argued that capitalism possessed contradictions, and history was a process that would turn this irrational society into a rational society. Marx argued that a communist society would resolve contradiction and thus the dialectical produces a pre-determined historical future in a communist society. Thus far, this essay has set out the dialectical process of history upon which Marx’s philosophy rests. It will now, explore the historical materialism that Marx argues drives the dialectical process. By marrying together a theory of historical materialism and dialectical determinism, it is possible to see how Marx understands how history would unfold, scientifically, into a communist society. Marx takes a scientific study of history and society, but rather than basing his conclusions on empirical and measurable findings, he premises his theory of history on causal structures. For Marx, â€Å"every form of society has been based†¦ on the antagonism of oppressing and oppressed classes† (Marx and Engels, 1985, p. 93). This theory of history links up to the Hegelian idea of a dialectical process that resolves contradiction by making the rational actual. First, though, this essay will sketch out Marx’s analysis of history up to the point he was writing, and how historical materialism had proceeded through various stages in world history. Marx constructs a history that is a narrative based on a structure, rather than a series of random events. For Marx, class is the structure upon which the narrative of history rests, â€Å"the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles† (Marx and Engels, 1985, p. 79). Marx argues that in previous stages of history, class was a complicated arrangement, but as the feudal system gave way to the capitalist system, the antagonism of the class system simplified. The cap italist system, for Marx, had led to society â€Å"splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat† (Marx and Engels, 1985, p. 80). The Communist Manifesto, as Hampsher-Monk illustrates, is an â€Å"account of economic-historical development† (Hampsher-Monk, 1992, p. 515) which argues that revolutionary politics is necessary to complete the process.. According to Goodwin, Marx saw economic and technical innovation as the originator of all historical change, with the most recent example being the replacing of a feudal society with a capitalist society (Goodwin, 1997, p. 76). Marx’s theory is undoubtedly economic, with Hampsher-Monk arguing that Marx drew an analogy between economics and religion, where money was seen as a ‘jealous god’ (Hampsher-Monk, 1992, p. 496). This prioritising of money and economics explains why it is economic relations that are the base structu re in Marx’s philosophy. Thus, when economic relations change, it â€Å"entails a transformation of the socio-political superstructure† (Goodwin, 1997, p. 76). In essence, historical materialism is the idea that economics constitutes the base structure of society, and a transformation in the economic structure is a part of the dialectical process of history, where contradictions in economic and social relations clash, and a new society emerges. For the purposes of this paper, the most important point to draw out is that both historical materialism and the historical determinism of the dialectical process of history constitute a scientific theory in Marx’s philosophy. Marx argues that a socialist-communist society is not utopian, but part of the revolutionary process of the dialectical. It is now necessary to outline the â€Å"scientific† process by which capitalist society would collapse under its own contradictions, and be replaced by a socialis t-communist society. For Marx, the dialectical process behind history saw the bourgeois/capitalist system as the â€Å"last major stage before a fundamentally new political and economic order† (Held, 1996, p. 126). Marx’s scientific theory of history saw the capitalist order as, ultimately, succumbing to the socialist-communist order. Marx details how this would come about, and to understand this it is necessary to once again return to the idea of the dialectical process and contradictions. Held summarises Marx’s theory of the inevitability of revolutionary politics, by arguing that for Marx, capitalism was not a harmonious social order and the foundations of capitalism are undermined from within (Held, 1996, pp. 126-129). Thus, Marx argues that capitalism is undermined because of its contradictions, and the dialectical process requires the overthrow of the capitalist system. Marx’s theory of contradiction within capitalism is based on his asse rtion of historical materialism, and his notion of exploitation. Marx argues that history has always been a struggle between oppressed and oppressor; thus, if it possible to observe exploitation, an oppressor and an oppressed class within capitalism, then it follows that history has not resolved the dialectical process. Marx argues that capitalism does possess such a contradiction, since â€Å"property†¦ is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour† (Marx and Engels, 1985, p. 97). Marx is, essentially, taking an objective, scientific look at the social-economic structure, arguing that it has not resolved class antagonism and therefore, the dialectical process is incomplete. Thus, for Marx, a socialist-communist revolution is not utopian, but a scientific ‘working-out’ of contradiction. To conclude Marx’s theory of history, it is necessary to now look at how he saw revolutionary politics overturning the capitalist order, and how he th ought a socialist-communist economic and social order would resolve the contradictions inherent in the capitalist order in order to produce a rational solution to the dialectical process. For Marx, revolution was inevitable, because revolution was the result of an antagonistic polarisation between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The worsening conditions of the proletariat would automatically propel them into a revolutionary mind-set and into war with the bourgeoisie/capitalist class. This would lead to the proletariat revolution, which would wrestle power from one class to another. However, this final stage would require two phases. Firstly, revolution would lead to the â€Å"Dictatorship of the Proletariat†, and then the second phase would lead to â€Å"Proper Communism†. Taylor picks up on the homogenising and authoritarian streak in Marx’s communist vision. He wryly observes that Marx is claiming that he and The Communists were the ones who underst ood what was happening in the world, and when The Communists say they have no interests apart from those of the proletariat, they are assuming that â€Å"the proletariat would agree to have only the interests which Marx said it ought to have† (Taylor, 1985, p. 31). Marx concludes that the antagonism within the capitalist order is the result of the bourgeoisie’s exploitation of the capital of the proletariat; and, thus, the key to â€Å"The Communist programme was the abolition of private property† (Taylor, 1985, p. 31). This is critical to understanding that, for Marx, a socialist-communist society is not so much a Utopia, as a ‘working–out’ of the dialectical process. Marx’s scientific method to history rests on the notion that private property constitutes a contradiction within the capitalist order, and that the dialectical process will result in revolution to overthrow the capitalist order; therefore, a communist society is a scientific resolution necessity, rather than being a utopian ideal. Goodwin argues that Marx was â€Å"reluctant to offer any detailed picture of the communist utopia† (Goodwin, 1997, p.81). However, Marx had identified the contradiction within capitalism that would lead to its overthrow, namely the antagonism between capitalists and workers and the exploitation that lay at the heart of this. Therefore, the implication of Marx’s thought is that a socialist-communist utopia would find a means to eradicate class exploitation. As Goodwin says, Marx may not have laid down a â€Å"blueprint†, but â€Å"the formal characteristics of communist society are made clear in his works, as are the particular principles on which it would operate† (Goodwin, 1997, p.81). As indicated earlier, Marx argued that all history was the history of class struggles; therefore, a socialist-communist society would be classless. By eliminating the antagonisms of class, the c ontradictions of capitalism would be resolved, and the dialectical process of history would be rationally worked through. The elimination of class rests on the elimination of the capitalist means of production. Thus, â€Å"communism connotes the abolition of private property† (Goodwin, 1997, p.81). The â€Å"utopia† of communism-socialism is a classless society that has abolished private property. However, because of the historical materialism and dialectical process that underpins Marx’s theory, the communist â€Å"utopia† is also a scientific resolution to the contradictions within capitalism. It is the contradictions Engels within capitalism that will lead the dialectical process of history to produce a revolution that will usher in communism. Taylor puts this succinctly â€Å"dialectical materialism would compel men to live in Utopia whatever the promptings of their heart† (Taylor, 1985, p. 10). Despite arguing that Marx saw a social ist-communist society as the inevitable result of a scientific process, it should not be underestimated how revolutionary his vision was. Marx was a revolutionary thinker, and he was calling for an overturning of the capitalist system. This was not utopian, as it was not the dreams of a â€Å"good place†, a utopia. Instead, Marx saw a socialist-communist society, based on the abolition of private property, as the rational solution to the dialectical process of history. His work is polemical, and he does not conceal the radical and revolutionary aspects of his political thought. He argues that The Communists â€Å"openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible and overthrow of all existing social conditions† (Marx and Engels, 1985, p. 120). He goes on to say that â€Å"the ruling classes tremble at a Communist revolution† (Marx and Engels, 1985, p. 120). Given that Marx is unequivocally envisaging the ordering of an entirely different e conomic, social and political structure, his vision has a utopian element. However, Marx, himself, denied that his vision was utopian. Instead, he saw a communist society, as the scientifically determined and rational culmination of the dialectical. Engels argued that utopian socialists did not look to history and science: â€Å"not one of them appears as a representative of the interests of that proletariat which historical development had, in the meantime, produced† (Engels, on-line). However, the drawing of this distinction has limited value, since the scientific method is designed to construct a dialectical logic that argues that the socialist-communist â€Å"utopia† is something that must be realized. Bibliography Engels, Friedrich. Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. Retrieved March 6, 2015, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/index.htm Goodwin, Barbara (1997) Using Political Ideas (4th edition), John Wiley Sons, Chichester pp. 65 – 97. Hampsher-Monk, (1992). â€Å"Karl Marx† in A history of modern political thought: Major political thinkers from Hobbes to Marx, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford pp. 483 563. Held, David (1996) Models of Democracy (2nd edition), Polity Press, Cambridge pp. 121 – 154. Marx, Karl, Engels, Friedrich (1985) The Communist Manifesto, Penguin Classics, London. Miller, Richard W. (2000) â€Å"Marxist Philosophy of Science† in Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge, London p. 532. Taylor, A. J. P. (1985) â€Å"Introduction† in The Communist Manifesto, Penguin Classics, London pp. 7 – 47.

John F. Kennedy Essay examples - 2430 Words

John F. Kennedy Black and white portrait of President Kennedy distributed by the White House John F. Kennedy was the president of the United States. He was also the youngest president and the first Roman Catholic. Although he was only in power for 2 years and 10 months his legacy still lives on today, through books, images, buildings and numerous conspiracy theories. American society over the years has portrayed him as an American Hero fighting for peace and justice. The media have cultivating this image of, â€Å"The Camelot legend.† After his assassination on 22nd November 1963 the myth of Kennedy was formed. The legend developed as a means to alleviate peoples†¦show more content†¦When Kennedy became president in 1961 he was faced with a difficult task. The country was in the midst of the fourth recession, which was putting a huge strain on the economy and mass unemployment. He was in the midst of the Cold war between communism and democracy. Americans were beginning to lose their faith in the presidency [KY1] and needed someone like Kennedy, a fresh, young face to promise hope for the future. A promise for the future is what Kennedy did. In his inaugural speech he asked the nation to come together to fight the â€Å"common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.†[2] Kennedy’s main enemy was communism which became a constant throughout his presidency. He came to power with the great promise of â€Å"A New Frontier† and a better future for Americans. John F Kennedy’s first year in office brought much success as he was able to pass important acts through Congress. He increased the minimum wage, passed a housing bill and granted government aid to areas of the country more economically depressed. These acts helped build on his popularity as people saw him as a caring president who was carrying out his promise of â€Å"a New Frontier.† Kennedy’s first major accomplishment as presidentShow MoreRelatedJohn F. Kennedy983 Words   |  4 PagesThe first Roman Catholic president, John F. Kennedy, fought through many hardships. Becoming the president at the age of 43, he went through many difficult trials to get that role due to his religion and health. Although he died early, he still managed to go beyond his presidential duties and accomplished a lot during his short term. John F. Kennedy was born on May 29, 1917 in Brookline, Massachusetts. Ever since he was little, he has had very poor health. He suffered from a variety of diseasesRead MoreJohn F. Kennedy 1158 Words   |  5 PagesAssassination, and Legacy of John F. Kennedy written by Dean R. Owen is a series of reflections of people who knew and admired John F. Kennedy. Most people in the book discuss where they were the day of his assassination, their reaction, and how it affected everything and everyone around them. Others speak about what kind of leader Kennedy was, the legacy he left behind, and how when he died the country was never the same. Owen writes about people who once worked for Kennedy as well as his goodRead MoreJohn F. Kennedy1635 Words   |  7 PagesPresident John F. Kennedy once said â€Å"The path we have chosen for the present is full of hazards, as all paths are. The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it. And one path we shall never choose, and that is the path of surrender, or submission† . Whether this statement was meant to describe the circumstances of the Cold War, or to display reasons for the use of the atomic bomb, these simple words brought understanding to the American people. That is, until the assassinationRead MoreAnalysis Of John F. Kennedy892 Words   |  4 PagesAdam Frankowski Mr. Vollmer English 12A 11 October 2015 Rough Draft- John F. Kennedy â€Å"And so my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.† Quotes like this earned John F. Kennedy the respect of a nation and the reputation as a great leader. His life is a major part of United States history for all that he contributed. John F. Kennedy is considered a hero for his memorable actions during his navy career, his ability to easeRead More John F. Kennedy Essay979 Words   |  4 PagesJohn F. Kennedy John F. Kennedy was one of the greatest presidents of the twentieth century. He united almost the entire nation under a common goal; the Moon. His charisma could turn skeptics into believers, and strengthen the bond between himself and his supporters. He had so much charisma because he used many rhetorical devices in his speeches, the same rhetorical devices that have been wooing crowds of people since the time of Rome. One of his most memorable speeches he gave was at RiceRead MoreThe Legacy Of John F. Kennedy1176 Words   |  5 PagesJohn F. Kennedy did a lot for our country although his presidential term was cut short. He had a certain allure to him that Americans liked. Kennedy knew what to do to gain the votes of all different types of voters no matter their age, race, or religion. His campaign and presidency have inspired even today’s presidents and presidential candidates in multiple ways. John F. Kennedy was a spectacular man and president that brought a fresh feel t o America and who left a legacy that will never be forgottenRead MoreThe Legacy Of John F. Kennedy980 Words   |  4 PagesBorn in 1917, John F. Kennedy grew up in a wealthy family with influence both politically, and economically. His grandfather was a famous politician, his father a billionaire, and his brothers he grew up with would go on to become well known politicians. Growing up in a family like this, it would appear hard to distinguish yourself, however, JFK would go on to surpass them all by becoming the 35th, and perhaps most beloved president of the United States. As president JFK was popular. He was youngRead MoreAnalysis Of John F. Kennedy1589 Words   |  7 Pages History Project John F. Kennedy was one of the most dynamic and inspiring presidents the country would ever know of. His leadership was impeccable and he motivated people by his charm and charisma. He had several qualities that made him so applauded by people. One of these qualities is the quality of his speech that made him the hero of the country. Not just his country was enchanted with his speeches but also the whole world felt a lot of connection with the words Kennedy spoke. Speech is oneRead MoreThe Legacy of John F. Kennedy1129 Words   |  5 PagesPresidents relate in life and none in death. Most people know John F. Kennedy as the 35th President of the United States, the youngest president, and one of fewest presidents that was killed. But what was JFKs legacy? JFK was born on May, 29th, 1917 in Brookline, Massachusetts, a quiet, clam suburb in Boston. As a child John F. Kennedy was mostly referred to the name Jack, by friends and family. His parents, Rose and Joseph Kennedy were too involved with social rank and their place in BostonsRead MorePresident John F. Kennedy1738 Words   |  7 Pages President John Fitzgerald Kennedy Our Nation’s 35th President Andrew Hogenson History 112 June 15, 2015 John Fitzgerald Kennedy was the 35th President of the USA and served at that position only for three years as at the end of the third year he was assassinated in Texas. Even though his presidential term was not long, it was significant, mostly with the strong opposition against the USSR (in a person of its Prime Minister of that time, Nikita Khrushchev). President Kennedy’s name is associated

Guatemalan Genocide Free Essays

â€Å"Whenever the power that is put in any hands for the government of the people, and the protection of our properties, is applied to other ends, and made use of to impoverish, harass or subdue them to the arbitrary and irregular commands of those that have it; there it presently becomes tyranny, whether those that thus use it are one or many† From the majestic words of the brilliant Philoshope John Locke, a governmental system has the obligation to provide and work for the people, in either a direct or indirect matter.The system should satisfy and benefit the citizen in every possible aspect, rather than preventing the forward advancement of a nation’s people. Locke believed that the power of government should be controlled by the governed, and if the government fails to preserve the rights of the people, the power should be stripped away and the governed have the given right to overthrow the existing government. We will write a custom essay sample on Guatemalan Genocide or any similar topic only for you Order Now Although this principal is democratic in nature, it is a key factor in the relationship between the government and the governed of any given nation.In many Latin American countries, a strong central government has always been the most common form of administration. The government, regardless of being a democratic or a socialist one, manages and controls the majority if not all of the aspects of the country such as the regulation commerce, the distribution of natural resources, the overall management of the banking systems and the department of agriculture.This makes the country much more subjective to corruption and an unbalance of power with in its own system because the government has so much influence and control within the nation that it almost forms a political or social â€Å"monopoly†, in which there is no higher authority to regulate or police what, and in what way different aspects of â€Å"The legislative acts against the trust reposed in them, when they Endeavour to invade the property of the subject, and to make themselves, or any part of the community, masters, or arbitrary disposers of the lives, liberties or fortunes of the people†In the middle 1900’s, the republic of Guatemala, had much instability within its own people, governmentally and militarily due to the racial tension between Mayan Indian natives and European decent citizens. The tensions between the two began to escalade and thicken to a point that violent protesting and riots erupted all over the country in a matter of years. The Guatemalan government, using the national army and its counter insurgency force, began a systematic campaign of repressions and suppressions against Mayan Indians, whom they claimed were working toward a communist coup (Fein 72). It was because of the political instability and public crisis within the Guatemalan government and the country’s social system that made it an ideal time for the URNG (Guatemalan National Revolutionary Union) to begin its plan to totally revolutionize the nation, which led to the massacre of thousands of innocent Guatemalan lives. Many groups have adopted Marxist communism as well as extreme socialistic dogmas and applied them to their own society for their self benefit.In the last two-hundred years, Latin America has seen numerous revolutionary acts, groups and ideologies that were meant to break the barriers of old, and traditional customs that were believe to have been ineffective towards the advancement of the nation. In the late 1960’s, many Guatemalan citizens, especially laborers and natives, had a huge lack of faith and trust within their own government. Their resentment towards the system had developed from the irresponsibility of the national government for no t spreading the wealth and prosperity to the natives whose hard labor made that flourishing possible.The laborers, which consisted of rural Indians who made up the majority of the work force in the country, worked for American investors of coffee plantations did not see any benefit from their painstaking work. Causing them not to trust in the governmental system that promised them many things such as better medical assistance within rural parts of the nation, better roads and highways around inaccessible towns and villages in many places of Guatemala and the better overall appreciation of the working natives. Since then, the tensions between the national government and the native people have not been cleared. During the 1970’s more and more protests and uprisings in the capital and the southwest part of the nation became very frequent, and overtime, very violent. The Peace Pledge Union expressed a dramatic and detailed example of the violent acts that the military of Guatemala racticed on Indian natives in search of subversives, Children were often beaten against walls, or thrown alive into pits where the bodies of adults were later thrown; they were also tortured and raped. Victims of all ages often had their limbs amputated, or were impaled and left to die slowly. Others were doused in petrol and set alight, or disemboweled while still alive. Yet others were shot repeatedly or tortured and shut up alone to die in pain the wombs of pregnant women were cut open.However, it took the Guatemalan military some time to actually suppress the violent uprisings and protests because of the intimidation they had received from the URNG (Guatemalan National Revolutionary Union), a group of socialistic radicals who thought that it was needed to take matters into their own hands by running, claming that the guerilla had ties with powerful drug lords and traffickers who supplied them with weapons and ammunition surpassing that of the military’s. This was a major element that was over seen by the Guatemalan military. If the military would had been tactical enough to for see that the guerilla organizations lacked in supplies and in men to support their violent uprisings against the government, the lives of thousands of innocent Guatemalan lives could have been saved. In the early 1980’s the Guatemalan army persisted in its battle with the Marxist-led guerilla movement by killing tens of thousands of Mayan Indians as suspected subversives.Remnants Of various guerrilla organizations joined together with the URNG and refused to stop fighting until they achieved justice with brute force. Being that the Guatemalan government did not have a solution to end the violence between the Indian rebels and the rest of the nation, the battle between them seemed endless. The lack of support or diplomatic backing from the United Nation and the United States resulted in an escalation of seriousness within the conflict and made the situat ion less suppressant.A key role that made the situation worsen was that the United Nations was not quick to react to the clash. The UN believed that the situation was to be left into the hands of the Guatemalan people according to Benjamin Valentino, author of the book, Final Solutions: Mass Killings and Genocide. According to the United Nations, the situation in the country was not as intense or as serious as they thought it would be. However not only was the UN misinformed about this dilemma, but the whole world did not ealize the magnitude of what was happening in this third world country. Often referred to as â€Å"The Silent Genocide† the world around them had no or very little knowledge of what was actually happening to thousands of Guatemalan citizens (Victoria 56). The United Sates had very little involvement during the 1950’s. When the US realized that the president of Guatemala, Colonel Jacobo Arbenz Guzman, had supposed communist advisors in his cabinet. The US saw this as a major threat of having a communist influence country so close to American soil. The Eisenhower administration planned to overthrown the president, and the Central Intelligence Agency intimidated the Guatemalan army into abandoning Arbenz, and instead adopting US selected Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas. This drastic change reversed the land reforms and many other achievements of the pervious government. Over time Armas was easily influenced by the corrupt officials in the central government. Armas then resigned paving the way for socialistic leader and General of the battalion in Suchitepequez, Juan Jose Arevalo, to take office.The United States had one other major influence in the revolution and that was the funding of training programs to the revolutionary leftist guerillas that committed acts of genocide against the rural Mayan natives. According to Mireya Navarro of The New York Times, â€Å"the report, by the Historical Clarification Commission, contradicts years of official denials of the torture, kidnapping and execution of thousands of civilians in a war that the commission estimated killed more than 200,000 people†.Navarro later went on saying that; â€Å"Although the outlines of American support from Guatemala’s military have been well known, the nine-volume report confirms that the CIA aided Guatemalan forces. The commission listed the American training of the officer corps in counterinsurgency techniques as a factor that ‘had a significant bearing on the human rights violations during the armed confrontation’†. The report also states that the US was very much well aware of its contribution to the training of the military units that were committing acts of genocide, and yet still supported the Guatemalan army.These factors contributed in creating a chaotic and unstable state of mind in the central government which was an ideal environment or situation that made it possible for revolutionary groups such as the URNG to dominate in the confrontation in the country. The unstable government system and the growing chaotic social status made it more subjective for the URNG to have its ways in the conflict. The native Indians did not trust the government despite the reformation after the grasping dictator that was focused mainly on the progression of the country excluding the n atives.The amount of racism and prejudice put on the natives was just the right amount for them to realize the unjust doings of there own government. This angered them because their own government or in this case, there own country would disregard the Indians and pay more attention to huge investors in land ownership. The enraged natives increased the amount of violent protests in the streets, killing people who they though were against the advancement of the â€Å"campesinos† rural labor workers.The constant battles and conflict between the rural natives and the rest of the country caused the nation to be divided on this topic. The division that the country had on this situation, caused many individuals to have mixed and violent feelings towards supporters and/or rebels (revolucionistas vs. nacionales). Those who were against the rebels (natives) were targeted and persecuted by the armed rebel groups including the URNG. Those in favor of the rebels were persecuted by the government and were looked upon as domestic criminals and communistic threats.This led to a total confusion on who were the nacionales and who were the revolucionistas. The Guatemalan military took no precaution in this situation and stated targeting those who they felt were of the two. This led to innocent killings, murders, rapes and tortures of Guatemalan civilians and military operatives. The UNRG took advantage of the disarray of the country and its citizens, to appeal to the Guatemalan public and slowly take hold of the nation. They preached their Marxist ideology to the Guatemalan people.Saying that it was a God given right to rebel against a government that no intention or consideration for its own people. This appealed very well to the public due to the fact that the citizens needed reliance, other than the government, on some sort of plan, which they found in the UNRG. The citizens were tired of promises and plans; they needed something to depend on that was productive and realistic. This increased the number of leftist party members in the country. The central government responded by increasing their involvement in the different districts of the country.The military ran raids in rural towns and native villages the middle of the night, storming through houses killing and slaughtering those who rebelled against the government or had connections or supported the URNG. According to the Peace Pledge Union, a organization the analyzes and studies the complexity of violent conflicts and protest, â€Å"Covert operations were also carried out by the military units called ‘commandos’, backed up by the army and military intelligence. They carried out planned executions and forced ‘disappearances’.Death squads largely made up of criminals, murdered suspected subversives or their allies; under dramatic names, such as ‘the white hand’ or ‘eye for an eye’, they terrorized the country and contributed to the deliberate strate gy of psychological warfare and intimidation. † This is the thousands of lives of men, women and children that were taken over the time period of eleven years. Mass murder resulted in a scare all over the country; citizens were being murdered by their very own people. This made it easier for the URNG to advance even deeper into situation because of all the disarray and confusion among the citizens and the military.Others can say that the nation’s military did their best in suppressing the riots and rebellions by receiving a raise in funds from the government, in an effort to salvage the country. That the military did all in its entirety to benefit the people of Guatemala and to protect them form the revolutionary force that was the leftist URNG. However, their responsiveness toward the dire situation was sluggish and incompetent. The military waited to long for a stable resolution to the conflict, at the expense of thousands of Guatemalan Lives.Others can also say The UNRG revolutionary group was an organization that kept in perspective the progress of the Guatemalan people and not to spread the ideology of Marxism. That the URNG was just a mere organization that wanted to better the lives of the Guatemalan citizens through action, and had no intent or the desire to spread revolutionary and idealistic methods and dogmas. However, even though their intent towards the beginning of the situation was good and beneficial, they realized the need for drastic change overtime, causing them to become more and more power hungry and influential ideologically toward the Guatemalan public.The lives of thousands of Guatemalans could have been salvaged if the national government had better judgment and intention when it came to supplying the public with civil service. If the central government would have remained firm and stable with proper military suppression and keeping civil order in a time of crisis and chaos, the result would have been completely different, and if that would have been kept stable, the revolutionary group would have not been able to stand a chance to the military suppression of the govern ment and therefore would have not been able to justify the lives of thousands with leftist ideology.But it was because of the lack of stability with in the governmental system and the social status, which took the lives of Thousands of Guatemalan people who deserved to die for a better cause and not the failure of people they chose to take control of the nation to make a significant difference. How to cite Guatemalan Genocide, Papers

Charisma Essay Example For Students

Charisma Essay What is charisma? Who has it? What does it take to have charisma? Charisma is known as a personality trait, but can it be considered a quality a person possesses? An individual with charisma is able to inspire and motivate people around themselves, but the direction a leader inspires is not necessarily good. This may be the case to those being influenced by the person they choose to follow, but its not always positive in the eyes of societys morals. David Koresh is a prime example of a charismatic leader, but the people he led seemed to be blind to their own health, and their familys health, both physically and mentally. This can settle any argument about charisma being a true quality, or a positive trait of someones personality. One of the moving characteristics concerning the followers of Koresh was the unplausible trust they had for Koresh, which demonstrates trust as one of the strongest attributes a charismatic leader can possess. Can one conclude though, that trust is the stron gest and most important asset to charisma? Maybe in David Koreshs predicament, but not in all cases of charisma. Charisma has many elements to it, and in different situations any one one factor can be stronger than another. Trust is indeed a very strong element involved with charisma because it allows followers to see past many imperfections, either physically or psychologically, that their leader may have. Trust gives an assurance in peoples actions toward their leader even though many times all the needed and desired information about this person is not known (Fairholm, 1994). The followers of the charismatic leader David Koresh were a prime example of unwavering trust despite the fact that Davids principles were immoral to the accepted views of society. Gilbert Fairholm (1994) acknowledges trust as transforming and being able to impel, or empower, others to change towards the views of the trusted leader. Koreshs followers acted sexually immoral, giving up their daughters and wives to the wants of their leader, forgetting their own principles and ethics. People trusted David Koresh enough to sacrifice their lives and their human livelihood. Followers were willing to forget everything they knew and val ued and they placed their lives into the hands of Koresh and allowed him to make their decisions in their social and personal lives. The Koresh church ended by burning to the ground without anyone escaping the life taking flames to save their familys or their own lives. The faith in David Koresh was taken to the grave by his followers, showing the frightening strength of trust. Other principles someone with charisma might possess is having and sharing a vision. Visions are a strong influence used by leaders to inspire followers supporting them and has proven to give exceptionally good results from followers (Kirkpatrick ; Locke, 1996). Former president John F. Kennedy had a great vision for America, and with it he revealed to Americans the possibilities of a better world through hard work and steady devotion. Kennedy was young and rich, but compassionate towards those who were less fortunate than others. President Kennedys vision was a beautiful, public-spirited picture, which was inspiring to many American citizens. The picture he painted was one of unity and peace worldwide. With Kennedys saying, Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country, he motivated thousands of Americans, even the elite, to join the United States Peace Corp. John Kennedy also used a component of charisma known as vision implementation during his presidency. Experiments show that vision implementation provides some of the best results from people being led by charismatic leaders (Kirkpatrick Locke, 1996). With vision implementation, Kennedy was able to lead citizens more strongly in their march for prosperity. John Kennedy utilized his advantage of vision implementation by setting an example of a model person who worked firmly and consistently towards each of his goals. As a role model, Kennedy showed how to take the proper attitude and approach to following through with hard work in reaching goals. Another way President Kennedy employed vision implementation was by giving his support to individuals who focused their efforts towards improving and promoting humanitarian organizations. .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b , .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b .postImageUrl , .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b , .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b:hover , .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b:visited , .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b:active { border:0!important; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b:active , .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uc8aee3e100dd2d0485cedd3ab9cbfb3b:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Slims Table Sociology Paper EssayCommunication Style is probably one of the most visible components of charisma within an influential leader. Having strong communication skills empowers an individual to exalt his or her charismatic attributes. Dr. Tony Alessandra points out that the ability to talk and persuade others, both forms of communication style, are key ingredients of charisma (Alessandra, no date). Adolf Hitler exemplified his ability of communication, and is one of the most revered speakers of all time, albeit villainous. When Adolf Hitler spoke, he spoke with enthusiasm, and he spoke with an untouchable confidence that filled German followers with inspiration an d motivation. Hitler created a sense of Nazi superiority over all nations and ethnic groups worldwide within his German followers. The Nazis followed Hitler in the famous World War II Holocaust massacre, taking countless numbers of lives from the Jews and anyone else who posed a threat to the German regime. From the leadership and speeches by Dictator Adolf Hitler, Germans rampaged throughout Europe to achieve the dominance they believed their race to have. Charisma is a very strong and influential personality trait, but it cannot be deduced from someones social status or position they may hold. Charisma must reflect a persons attitude and behavior (Shamir, 1992). The features of trust, taking and sharing a vision and communication style are all common qualities a strong leader possesses. One must conclude though, that these qualities are not only possessed by strong political and social leaders. Gaining someones trust in friendship, having a vision and/or communicating with someone else is an everyday occurrence for many people. All people have the ability and potential to have charisma. It is up to the individual to decide what he or she will do with their own possibilities. Bibliography:ReferencesAlessandra, T. Charisma (no date). (online) http://www.pathfinder.com/twep/waralessandra_phd/charisma/index.htmlFairholm, G. W. (1994). Leadership and the culture of trust. Praeger PublishersKirkpatrick, S. A., ; Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psycology, 81(1), 36-48. Shamir, B. (1992). Attribution of influence and charisma to the leader: The romance of leadership revisited. Journal of Applied Social Psycology, 22(5), 387-407